Skip to main content

It is important for you to complete this form for each adjudicator who you observed at an AACTFest. Your name and contact information are kept confidential, but the rating and comments will be shared with the adjudicators. Please let [email protected] know if you have any questions or contact our office at 817-732-3177.   


All questions are based on the AACT Adjudication Training Manual and the AACT Adjudication Curriculum.

Please fill out within two days of returning home.  Thank you.

Which AACTFest was this adjudicator being evaluated for?

Which AACTFest was this adjudicator being evaluated for?

Location of Festival
The adjudicator demonstrated the ability to address performances' technical and artistic elements.
The adjudicator kept personal likes and dislikes out of the evaluation.
The AACT Handbook states, "Adjudicators' personal likes and dislikes to authors and materials are not to play any part in the adjudication process."
The adjudicator addressed the cast, crew, and house.

The AACT Handbook states, "The adjudicator should address comments to the entire house as well as cast and crew of the performance."

The adjudicator provided a balanced critique that congratulated performance successes.

Critique should be balanced to include a clear understanding of what aspects of the performance were successful and possibilities for growth in the future. "The adjudicator provided a balanced critique that congratulated performance successes and gave the company concrete advice for improvement."

The adjudicator gave specific advice that could be used in the company's next rehearsal.

When suggestions for improvement are offered, the ideas should provide specific, useful tools.

The adjudicator provided specific examples.

Strong critique includes general perceptions made clearer with specific examples to illustrate general observations.

I would recommend this adjudicator to others.

The following are ways of describing the adjudicator attributes.